How to Write Better AI Instructions
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Good instructions make Aissist more accurate and more consistent.
Weak instructions lead to vague replies, missed steps, and unnecessary escalation.
Use this guide to write instructions that are clear, bounded, and easy to follow.
Write clearer instructions
Start with one clear objective
State the job in direct language.
Weak instruction:
Answer customer questions about pricing.
Stronger instruction:
Provide concise pricing guidance. Do not give exact pricing without required inputs. Escalate when pricing depends on unavailable data.
This works because it defines:
the task
the limit
the escalation trigger
Define what Aissist should not do
Aissist tries to be helpful. If limits are unclear, it may fill gaps.
Add explicit rules such as:
do not guess
do not estimate unavailable values
do not invent product rules
escalate when unsure
This is especially important for pricing, policy exceptions, and technical troubleshooting.
Separate facts from instructions
Put facts where they belong.
Use:
Workspace Context for shared business facts
Assets for reference knowledge
Instructions for behavior rules
Sub agents for workflow-specific logic
For example, do not explain a return policy only in instructions if the policy belongs in an asset.
See Tune Aissist Behavior for how these layers work together.
Prefer intent over exact phrasing
Do not force one fixed sentence unless the wording must stay exact.
Weak instruction:
Respond with: "You can order just one item."
Stronger instruction:
Confirm that the customer can order a single item. Use natural wording that matches the conversation.
This keeps replies flexible without losing the intended message.
Use exact wording only when it is required for:
legal or compliance statements
approved disclaimers or promises
text that must match another workflow exactly
For conversation closings, define the outcome instead of scripting the full reply.
Example: close a resolved support conversation
Weak instruction:
When the user confirms the issue is fully resolved, respond with: "I'm glad we were able to resolve your issue. It was a pleasure assisting you today! If you need any further help, feel free to reach out anytime—we're available 24/7. Have a wonderful day!"
Stronger instruction:
If the user confirms the issue is fully resolved, politely close the conversation.
Thank the user for contacting support.
Mention that help is available 24/7 if needed.
Wish the user a great day.
Do not continue troubleshooting or ask additional questions after the user confirms resolution.
This works better because it:
preserves the goal
lets the wording fit the conversation
avoids repetitive scripted replies
Keep instructions bounded
Avoid open-ended phrasing such as:
if relevant
explain thoroughly
add more details
Use precise constraints instead:
keep the reply under 3 sentences
ask one question at a time
do not expand beyond the defined explanation
Specific constraints make replies more stable.
Build workflow instructions
Use step-based workflows
Aissist follows step-by-step logic better than long paragraphs.
Instead of:
When customers ask about pricing, answer clearly and collect details before escalating.
Write:
Pricing request flow
Ask for quantity.
Ask for ZIP code.
Collect any other required input.
Escalate if exact pricing still depends on unavailable data.
This reduces ambiguity and keeps behavior consistent.
Start sub agent instructions with a workflow title
For sub agents, begin with a short workflow name.
Then list the steps for that workflow.
This makes the instruction easier to scan and easier to maintain.
Instead of:
When users ask where their order is, check whether they shared the order number, ask for it if missing, provide tracking details if available, and escalate if tracking cannot be found.
Write:
Order tracking workflow
Check whether the user shared the order number.
Ask for the order number if it is missing.
Provide tracking details if they are available.
Escalate if tracking is unavailable or the issue needs human review.
This structure works well for returns, cancellations, billing, and other workflow-specific sub agents.
Keep troubleshooting sequential
Give one next action at a time.
Do not send several troubleshooting steps in one message.
Use this pattern:
diagnose from the current message
give one clear next step
wait for the result
continue only if needed
escalate after the defined limit
This keeps the conversation grounded in the current state.
Define escalation clearly
Do not write vague rules like:
Escalate if necessary.
Write exact triggers instead:
required data is missing
the user asks for a human
the answer depends on unavailable system access
the workflow remains unresolved after a defined number of steps
Use Escalation in workspace settings to customize global handoff rules.
Use sub agents when only one workflow needs special escalation behavior.
See Configure Workspace Settings for workspace fields.
See Streamline with Human Team for handoff workflow guidance.
Format for readability
Prefer lists over tables
Use bullet lists and short sections for most instructions.
This structure is usually easier to follow than tables.
Use lists for:
rules
step-by-step workflows
conditions and exceptions
Use tables only when the relationship between rows and columns matters.
For example, tables can work for:
comparing instruction levels
mapping channels to behaviors
listing fixed field requirements
If a table is not necessary, rewrite it as headings and bullets.
Example: rewrite a table as a workflow list
Less effective:
User asks for a refund
Ask for the order number, ask for the reason, explain the policy, escalate if needed
User asks for tracking
Ask for the order number, provide tracking if available, escalate if unavailable
Better:
Refund request
Ask for the order number.
Ask for the reason for the refund.
Explain the relevant policy.
Escalate if the case needs review.
Tracking request
Ask for the order number.
Share tracking details if available.
Escalate if tracking is unavailable.
The second version is easier to scan, update, and follow.
Put each rule in the right place
Use the field that matches the job:
Instruction — universal behavior rules
Context — shared business facts
Tasks — what the workspace should accomplish
Escalation — global handoff logic
Sub agent Scenario — when a workflow should trigger
Sub agent Instruction - how the workflow should work
Sub agent Task — what that workflow should achieve
Sub agent Summary — structured notes for the human team
Assets — reference knowledge retrieved only when relevant
If one rule applies only to returns, billing, or tracking, move it into a sub agent.
Common mistakes
Avoid these patterns:
mixing facts, tone, and workflow steps in one long paragraph
leaving unknowns undefined
forcing rigid wording for every reply
turning example replies into required scripts
using instructions where an asset or action is needed
writing escalation rules without clear triggers
Best practice
Keep instructions short.
State limits directly.
Use sub agents for workflow logic and assets for knowledge.
Last updated

